Why has conventional intrapartum cardiotocography not given the expected results?
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in jpme
- Vol. 24 (1) , 15-23
- https://doi.org/10.1515/jpme.1996.24.1.15
Abstract
It is probable that conventional electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) has reduced the intrapartum death rate, but the expected dramatic reduction in neurological handicap has not occurred. There are two reasons for this: the majority of infants, who develop neurological problems have been harmed before the onset of labor, and the method of EFM has been more difficult to use in daily routine than expected. However, EFM is the best method we have to monitor high risk cases and the results can be improved by better training of the staff.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiotocography during labour.BMJ, 1993
- Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring — A Disappointing StoryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Effects of Electronic Fetal-Heart-Rate Monitoring, as Compared with Periodic Auscultation, on the Neurologic Development of Premature InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- CEREBRAL PALSY AMONG CHILDREN BORN DURING THE DUBLIN RANDOMISED TRIAL OF INTRAPARTUM MONITORINGThe Lancet, 1989
- Intrapartum asphyxia: A rare cause of cerebral palsyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1988
- Fetal distress and the condition of the newborn using cardiotocography and fetal blood analysis during labourBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987
- Antecedents of Cerebral PalsyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- A paediatrician asks—why is it called birth injury?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Neonatal Convulsions: Aetiology, Late Neonatal Status and Long‐Term OutcomeDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1978
- THE CHANGING PANORAMA OF CEREBRAL PALSY IN SWEDEN 1954–1970Acta Paediatrica, 1975