Capabilities, well‐being and human development: A survey
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Development Studies
- Vol. 33 (2) , 143-162
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389608422460
Abstract
Economists have moved away from thinking of development in terms of growth of per capita GNP. The most influential alternative conception of development ‐ due to Amartya Sen ‐ involves judging the quality of life in terms of capabilities and viewing development as a ‘capability expansion’. This article argues that Sen's approach is an inadequate account of development. It is further argued that other versions of the approach ‐ involving the work of Nussbaum and Frankfurt ‐ also fail. The most promising foundation for an account of human development derives from James Griffin's recent writings on well‐being.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Persons, Perspectives, and Full Information Accounts of the GoodEthics, 1995
- Full Information Accounts of Well-BeingEthics, 1994
- The Distinction Between Criterion and Decision Procedure: A Reply to Madison PowersUtilitas, 1994
- On the winding road from good to rightPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- The Human Good and the Ambitions of ConsequentialismSocial Philosophy and Policy, 1992
- Basic Needs Strategies, Human Rights, and the Right to DevelopmentHuman Rights Quarterly, 1989
- Resources, Values and Development. Amartya Sen, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984, 547 pages.Economics and Philosophy, 1986
- Commodities and Capabilities.The Economic Journal, 1986
- Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984The Journal of Philosophy, 1985
- Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a PersonThe Journal of Philosophy, 1971