The Sociodrama of Presidential Politics: Rhetoric, Ritual, and Power in the Era of Teledemocracy
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Anthropologist
- Vol. 101 (2) , 359-373
- https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.2.359
Abstract
In this paper I examine the American presidential campaign cycle as a series of ritualized sociodramas. Examples are used from the campaigns of 1988, 1992, and 1996 to illustrate the role of ritual, rhetoric, symbol, and media in the process of presidential power acquisition. These political processes are analyzed utilizing the concepts of sociodrama and rituals of rebellion extant in the literature of political anthropology. Specific cases such as the bus tours of the Clinton campaign, the Willie Horton commercials of the Bush campaign, and the case of Murphy Brown are examined in detail. The goal of the paper is to render an anthropological perspective on the process of choosing the American President in the era of teledemocracy. [American presidential campaign, ritual, rhetoric, symbol, media]Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contested Worlds: The Politics of Culture and the Politics of AnthropologyAnthropology and Humanism, 1994
- Ritual and Rhetoric in Presidential PoliticsCentral Issues in Anthropology, 1991
- Modern Political Ritual: Ethnography of an Inauguration and a Pilgrimage by President MitterrandCurrent Anthropology, 1988
- Anthropology, Language, PoliticsSociological Review, 1988
- discursive practices and power structure: person‐referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial VietnamAmerican Ethnologist, 1988
- The Election Campaign as a Liminal Stage — Negotiations over MeaningsSociological Review, 1987
- Politics as RhetoricEthics, 1982
- The Paradox of Public Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Political AccountsThe Journal of Politics, 1980
- Political SymbolismAnnual Review of Anthropology, 1979
- The Cultural Pattern of Indian Civilization: A Preliminary Report of a Methodological Field StudyThe Far Eastern Quarterly, 1955