A New Shape Measure for Evaluating Electoral District Patterns
- 1 September 1973
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 67 (3) , 947-950
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1958636
Abstract
The concept of shape is considered in abstract terms drawing on approaches outside the electoral districting literature. The concept is broken down into a series of four divergences from “compactness” relating to “elongation,” “indentation,” “separation,” and “puncturedness.” Given this conceptual framework, the use of shape measures in electoral districting is reconsidered and a new shape measure is proposed. This assesses the indentation of a district shape and is based on the internal angles within the shape. It is suggested that this measure may be particularly relevant to the evaluation of proposed new districting patterns. The technique is illustrated using proposed new Congressional Districts for Iowa.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distances within Shapes: An Introduction to a Family of Finite Frequency DistributionsGeografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 1971
- A Method of Measuring ShapeGeographical Review, 1970
- Dragons, Bacon Strips and Dumbbells. Who's Afraid of Reapportionment?The Yale Law Journal, 1966
- An Objective Method for Establishing Legislative DistrictsMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1966
- The Concept of Shape in GeographyGeographical Review, 1964
- Urban Research MethodsEconomic Geography, 1964
- A Procedure for Nonpartisan Districting: Development of Computer TechniquesThe Yale Law Journal, 1963
- A Note: Measuring Compactness as a Requirement of Legislative ApportionmentMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1961
- The Redistribution of SeatsPublic Administration, 1955
- Foundations of the Unity of Science. Volume II, no. 7: Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science.The Philosophical Review, 1953