The Proposed Rule for U.S. Clinical Trial Registration and Results Submission
- 8 January 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 372 (2) , 174-180
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsr1414226
Abstract
Broad access to information about clinical trials and their findings is critical for advancing medicine, promoting public health, and fulfilling ethical obligations to human volunteers.1 Traditional methods of information dissemination (e.g., presentations and publication) may nevertheless leave distortions and gaps in the knowledge base because the results of many trials are not published.2-4 Title VIII of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA)5 addressed some of these concerns by requiring the registration and submission of summary results information to ClinicalTrials.gov for certain clinical trials of drugs (including biologic products) and devices. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently published for public comment a proposed rule (or “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking [NPRM] for Clinical Trials Registration and Results Submission”)6 to clarify and expand (as permitted) the FDAAA requirements and ultimately facilitate compliance with the law. Separately, and in keeping with a long-standing principle that systematic dissemination of results is a critical step in realizing the value of the research investment,7,8 the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has issued a draft policy for public comment to promote registration and results submission to ClinicalTrials.gov.9 This policy is proposed to cover all NIH-funded clinical trials, regardless of study phase, type of intervention, or whether they are subject to the FDAAA requirements ( Table 1 ).Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory commentsBMJ, 2014
- Haphazard reporting of deaths in clinical trials: a review of cases of ClinicalTrials.gov records and matched publications–a cross-sectional studyBMJ Open, 2013
- The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key IssuesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Evaluation of the Value of Attribution in the Interpretation of Adverse Event Data: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group InvestigationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Outcome Reporting in Industry-Sponsored Trials of Gabapentin for Off-Label UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent EfficacyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Clinical Trial Registration — Looking Back and Moving AheadNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT StatementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Better Access to Information about Clinical TrialsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Underreporting research is scientific misconductJAMA, 1990