Significance Tests of Consensus Indices
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Systematic Zoology
- Vol. 35 (4) , 582-590
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2413117
Abstract
Monte Carlo methods were used to examine the sampling distribution of eight consensus indices based on either of the following two models: all bifurcating trees are equally likely; or all trees (including both bifurcating and multifurcating trees) are equally likely. Ten different consensus-tree methods were applied before computing consensus indices. The strictness of a consensus-tree method and the recognition ratio of a consensus index are the two main factors determining the consensus-index distribution. The former factor influences the mean index values; the latter changes the shape of the distribution curves. We furnish significance test tables for consensus trees or indices based on randomly generated trees permitting multifurcations. These tables can be used to test whether a given consensus tree or consensus-index value obtained from data on real organisms differs significantly from what one would expect if one were computing such quantities from randomly sampled trees.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- FACTORS DETERMINING THE ACCURACY OF CLADOGRAM ESTIMATION: EVALUATION USING COMPUTER SIMULATIONEvolution, 1985
- OTU Stability and Factors Determining Taxonomic Stability: Examples from the Caminalcules and the LeptopodomorphaSystematic Zoology, 1984
- -Consensus trees and indicesBulletin of Mathematical Biology, 1984
- A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Caminalcules. II. Estimating the True CladogramSystematic Zoology, 1983
- Taxonomic Congruence Re-ExaminedSystematic Zoology, 1983
- Testing the theory of evolution by comparing phylogenetic trees constructed from five different protein sequencesNature, 1982
- Taxonomic CongruenceSystematic Zoology, 1978
- The Number of Evolutionary TreesSystematic Zoology, 1978