Esophageal pH-Impedance Monitoring and Symptom Analysis in GERD: A Study in Patients off and on Therapy
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 101 (9) , 1956-1963
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00711.x
Abstract
Combined esophageal pH-impedance monitoring allows detection of nearly all gastroesophageal reflux episodes, acid as well as nonacid. However, the role of nonacid reflux in the pathogenesis of symptoms is poorly known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of this technique in patients with suspected reflux symptoms while on or off PPI therapy. The recordings of 150 patients recruited at seven academic centers with symptoms possibly related to gastroesophageal reflux were analyzed. Reflux events were detected visually using impedance (Sandhill, CO) and then characterized by pHmetry as acid or nonacid reflux. The temporal relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes was analyzed: a symptom association probability (SAP) ≥95% was considered indicative of a positive association. One hundred fifty patients were included, 102 women (mean age 52 ± 14 yr, range 16–84). Among the 79 patients off PPI, five did not report any symptom during the recording period. A positive SAP was found in 41 of the 74 symptomatic patients (55.4%), including acid reflux in 23 (31.1%), nonacid reflux in three (4.1%), and acid and nonacid in 15 (20.3%). In the group of patients on PPI (N = 71, 46 women, mean age 51 ± 15 yr), 11 were asymptomatic during the study, SAP was positive in 22 of the 60 symptomatic patients (36.7%), including acid reflux in three (5.0%), nonacid reflux in 10 (16.7%), and acid and nonacid in nine (15.0%). The symptoms most frequently associated with nonacid reflux were regurgitation and cough. Adding impedance to pH monitoring improves the diagnostic yield and allows better symptom analysis than pHmetry alone, mainly in patients on PPI therapy. The impact of this improved diagnostic value on gastroesophageal reflux disease management remains to be investigated by outcome studies.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Normal values and day‐to‐day variability of 24‐h ambulatory oesophageal impedance‐pH monitoring in a Belgian–French cohort of healthy subjectsAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2005
- Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoringGut, 2005
- Weakly acidic reflux in patients with chronic unexplained cough during 24 hour pressure, pH, and impedance monitoringGut, 2005
- Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: review and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas refluxGut, 2004
- Twenty-Four Hour Ambulatory Simultaneous Impedance and pH Monitoring: A Multicenter Report of Normal Values From 60 Healthy VolunteersAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2004
- Esomeprazole (40 Mg) Compared With Lansoprazole (30 Mg) in The Treatment of Erosive EsophagitisAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002
- Simultaneous intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux: Effect of omeprazoleGastroenterology, 2001
- Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysisGastroenterology, 1997
- Role of acid and duodenogastric reflux in esophageal mucosal injury: A review of animal and human studiesGastroenterology, 1995
- The symptom-association probability: An improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH dataGastroenterology, 1994