Neurogenic pain relief by repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation depends on the origin and the site of pain
Open Access
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 75 (4) , 612-616
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.022236
Abstract
Objective: Drug resistant neurogenic pain can be relieved by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex. This study was designed to assess the influence of pain origin, pain site, and sensory loss on rTMS efficacy. Patients and methods: Sixty right handed patients were included, suffering from intractable pain secondary to one of the following types of lesion: thalamic stroke, brainstem stroke, spinal cord lesion, brachial plexus lesion, or trigeminal nerve lesion. The pain predominated unilaterally in the face, the upper limb, or the lower limb. The thermal sensory thresholds were measured within the painful zone and were found to be highly or moderately elevated. Finally, the pain level was scored on a visual analogue scale before and after a 20 minute session of "real" or "sham" 10 Hz rTMS over the side of the motor cortex corresponding to the hand on the painful side, even if the pain was not experienced in the hand itself. Results and discussion: The percentage pain reduction was significantly greater following real than sham rTMS (−22.9% v −7.8%, p = 0.0002), confirming that motor cortex rTMS was able to induce antalgic effects. These effects were significantly influenced by the origin and the site of pain. For pain origin, results were worse in patients with brainstem stroke, whatever the site of pain. This was consistent with a descending modulation within the brainstem, triggered by the motor corticothalamic output. For pain site, better results were obtained for facial pain, although stimulation was targeted on the hand cortical area. Thus, in contrast to implanted stimulation, the target for rTMS procedure in pain control may not be the area corresponding to the painful zone but an adjacent one. Across representation plasticity of cortical areas resulting from deafferentation could explain this discrepancy. Finally, the degree of sensory loss did not interfere with pain origin or pain site regarding rTMS effects. Conclusion: Motor cortex rTMS was found to result in a significant but transient relief of chronic pain, influenced by pain origin and pain site. These parameters should be taken into account in any further study of rTMS application in chronic pain control.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committeePublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled treatment studies: are some “sham” forms active?Biological Psychiatry, 2000
- Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological studyPain, 1999
- Cortical reorganization in patients with facial palsyAnnals of Neurology, 1997
- The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brainElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1996
- Reorganization of human cortical motor output maps following traumatic forearm amputationNeuroReport, 1996
- Locating the Motor Cortex on the MRI with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and PETNeuroImage, 1996
- Chronic motor cortex stimulation in patients with thalamic painJournal of Neurosurgery, 1993
- Endogenous Pain Control Systems: Brainstem Spinal Pathways and Endorphin CircuitryAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1984
- Monopolar versus Bipolar StimulationStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 1982