Economic Evolution and Selection: Old Controversies and New Approaches
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Social Economics
- Vol. 17 (12) , 4-13
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000000462
Abstract
Many of the early debates about economic methodology, marginalism versus discontinuous change, stasis versus turbulence, co‐operation versus competition, were at base questions of general scientific methodology. During the past 20 years or so there has been a virtual revolution in the field of evolutionary biology. This revolution has had a profound impact on the philosophy of science; an impact which is beginning to be felt in the field of economics. The purpose of this article is to analyse some past controversies in economic methodology in the light of recent developments in evolutionary biology.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Schumpeter versus Darwin: In re MalthusSouthern Economic Journal, 1989
- Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical EventsThe Economic Journal, 1989
- Marshallian and Schumpeterian theories of economic evolution: Gradualism versus punctualismAtlantic Economic Journal, 1986
- The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: sorting and selection cannot be equatedPaleobiology, 1986
- Evolutionary Theory and Economic Theory: Some Methodological IssuesReview of Social Economy, 1985
- Individuals, hierarchies and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theoryPaleobiology, 1984
- Macroevolution and the Fossil RecordEvolution, 1982
- Evolutionary Theory Under FireScience, 1980
- Darwin after MalthusJournal of the History of Biology, 1979
- MALTHUS AND THE EVOLUTIONISTS: THE COMMON CONTEXT OF BIOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL THEORYPast & Present, 1969