Effect of acute head-down tilt on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area and proton transverse relaxation time
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 81 (4) , 1572-1577
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.4.1572
Abstract
Conley, Michael S., Jeanne M. Foley, Lori L. Ploutz-Snyder, Ronald A. Meyer, and Gary A. Dudley. Effect of acute head-down tilt on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area and proton transverse relaxation time. J. Appl. Physiol.81(4): 1572–1577, 1996.—This study investigated changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) evoked by fluid shifts that accompany short-term 6° head-down tilt (HDT) or horizontal bed rest, the time course of the resolution of these changes after resumption of upright posture, and the effect of altered muscle CSA, in the absence of increased contractile activity, on proton transverse relaxation time (T2). Average muscle CSA and T2were determined by standard spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Analyses were performed on contiguous transaxial images of the neck and calf. After a day of normal activity, 24 h of HDT increased neck muscle CSA 19 ± 4 (SE)% ( P < 0.05) while calf muscle CSA decreased 14 ± 3% ( P < 0.05). The horizontal posture (12 h) induced about one-half of these responses: an 11 ± 2% ( P < 0.05) increase in neck muscle CSA and an 8 ± 2% decrease ( P < 0.05) in the calf. Within 2 h after resumption of upright posture, neck and calf muscle CSA returned to within 0.5% ( P > 0.05) of the values assessed after a day of normal activity, with most of the change occurring within the first 30 min. No further change in muscle CSA was observed through 6 h of upright posture. Despite these large alterations in muscle CSA, T2was not altered by more than 1.1 ± 0.6% ( P > 0.05) and did not relate to muscle size. These results suggest that postural manipulations and subsequent fluid shifts modeling microgravity elicit marked changes in muscle size. Because these responses were not associated with alterations in muscle T2, it does not appear that simple movement of water into muscle can explain the contrast shift observed after exercise.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Noninvasive Analysis of Human Neck Muscle FunctionSpine, 1995
- Redistribution of body fluids during postural manipulationsActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1995
- Changes in lower limb muscle cross‐sectional area and tissue fluid volume after transition from standing to supineActa Physiologica Scandinavica, 1993
- On the pH Dependence of Protein StabilityJournal of Molecular Biology, 1993
- Effect of perfusion on exercised muscle: MR imaging evaluationJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1992
- Muscle Activity Localization with31P Spectroscopy and Calculated T2-Weighted 1H ImagesInvestigative Radiology, 1991
- Temperature Dependence of dynamics of hydrated myoglobinJournal of Molecular Biology, 1990
- Direct Relationship Between Proton T2 and Exercise Intensity in Skeletal Muscle MR ImagesInvestigative Radiology, 1990
- Temperature dependence of proton relaxation times in vitroMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1987
- Water phases in rat striated muscles as determined by T2 proton NMR relaxation timesMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1987