How should the TNM staging system for lung cancer be revised? A simulation based on the Japanese Lung Cancer Registry populations
- 31 August 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vol. 132 (2) , 316-319
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.03.048
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognosis of 6644 resected non-small cell lung cancers in Japan: A Japanese lung cancer registry studyPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Impact of Large Tumor Size on Survival After Resection of Pathologically Node Negative (pN0) Non–Small Cell Lung CancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- T2 tumors larger than five centimeters in diameter can be upgraded to T3 in non–small cell lung cancerThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2001
- Prognosis and survival after resection for bronchogenic carcinoma based on the 1997 TNM-staging classification: the Japanese experienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Results of surgical treatment of non–small cell lung cancer: validation of the new postoperative pathologic tnm classificationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2000
- Impact of Revised Stage Classification of Lung Cancer on SurvivalChest, 1999
- Prognostic assessment of 1310 patients with non–small-cell lung cancer who underwent complete resection from 1980 to 1993The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1998
- Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in patients with stage I pulmonary carcinomaThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1994
- Strategy for lymphadenectomy in lung cancer three centimeters or less in diameterThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Survival after conservative resection for T1 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990