Coregulator Function: A Key to Understanding Tissue Specificity of Selective Receptor Modulators
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Endocrine Society in Endocrine Reviews
- Vol. 25 (1) , 45-71
- https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2003-0023
Abstract
Ligands for the nuclear receptor superfamily control many aspects of biology, including development, reproduction, and homeostasis, through regulation of the transcriptional activity of their cognate receptors. Selective receptor modulators (SRMs) are receptor ligands that exhibit agonistic or antagonistic biocharacter in a cell- and tissue context-dependent manner. The prototypical SRM is tamoxifen, which as a selective estrogen receptor modulator, can activate or inhibit estrogen receptor action. SRM-induced alterations in the conformation of the ligand-binding domains of nuclear receptors influence their abilities to interact with other proteins, such as coactivators and corepressors. It has been postulated, therefore, that the relative balance of coactivator and corepressor expression within a given target cell determines the relative agonist vs. antagonist activity of SRMs. However, recent evidence reveals that the cellular environment also plays a critical role in determining SRM biocharacter. Cellular signaling influences the activity and subcellular localization of coactivators and corepressors as well as nuclear receptors, and this contributes to gene-, cell-, and tissue-specific responses to SRM ligands. Increased understanding of the effect of cellular environment on nuclear receptors and their coregulators has the potential to open the field of SRM discovery and research to many members of the nuclear receptor superfamily.Keywords
This publication has 304 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Dynamic Structural Model for Estrogen Receptor-α Activation by Ligands, Emphasizing the Role of Interactions between Distant A and E DomainsMolecular Cell, 2002
- Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2002
- Interaction of estrogen receptors α and β with estrogen response elementsMolecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 2001
- Cofactor Dynamics and Sufficiency in Estrogen Receptor–Regulated TranscriptionCell, 2000
- Agonistic Effect of Tamoxifen Is Dependent on Cell Type, ERE-Promoter Context, and Estrogen Receptor Subtype: Functional Difference between Estrogen Receptors α and βBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1997
- MAP Kinase-Dependent Transcriptional Coactivation by Elk-1 and Its Cofactor CBPBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1996
- Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4Nature, 1988
- The A and B forms of the chicken progesterone receptor arise by alternate initiation of translation of a unique mRNABiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1987
- Effects of anti-estrogens on bone in castrated and intact female ratsBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1987
- A New Anti-oestrogenic Agent in Late Breast Cancer: An Early Clinical Appraisal of ICI46474British Journal of Cancer, 1971