Protein expression changes in the Sprague Dawley rat liver proteome following administration of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α and γ ligands
- 31 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Proteomics
- Vol. 3 (4) , 505-512
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200390064
Abstract
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily and are intimately involved in lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis. Activation of these receptors in rodents can lead to hepatomegaly and ultimately hepatic carcinogenesis although the mechanisms by which these processes occur are poorly understood. To further our understanding of these processes and to discriminate between different PPAR mediated signalling pathways, a proteomic approach has been undertaken to identify changes in protein expression patterns in Sprague Dawley rat liver following dosing with a PPARα agonist (Wyeth 14643), a PPARγ agonist (Troglitazone) and a compound with mixed PPARα/γ agonist activity (SB‐219994). Using one‐and‐two‐dimensional electrophoresis of tissue lysates a diverse range of protein abundance changes was observed in these tissues. Whilst a number of these proteins have PPAR response elements (PPREs) in their respective promoters, another group was detected whose expression has been documented to be sensitive to peroxisome proliferator administration. Most notably within these groups, proteins involved in lipid catabolism displayed increased expression following drug administration. A further subset of proteins, with less obvious biological implications, also showed altered expression patterns. Where available, sequences upstream of the coding regions of genes not previously known to have PPREs were searched with positional consensus matrices for the presence of PPREs in an attempt to validate these changes. Using such an approach putative PPARγ and PPARδ response elements were discovered upstream of the tubulin β coding region. There was limited overlap in observed protein abundance changes between the three groups, and where this was the case (cytosolic epoxide hydrolase, peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme, hydroxymethyl glutaryl CoA, synthase, long chain acyl‐CoA thioesterase), expression of these proteins had previously been shown to be under the control of PPAR activity.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Principal component analysis of mass spectra of peptides generated from the tryptic digestion of protein mixturesRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2001
- PPARα-Dependent Alteration of GRP94 Expression in Mouse HepatocytesBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2000
- Central role of PPARα in the mechanism of action of hepatocarcinogenic peroxisome proliferatorsMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2000
- The Peroxisome Proliferator Response Element (PPRE) Present at Positions −681/−669 in the Rat Liver 3-Ketoacyl-CoA Thiolase B Gene Functionally Interacts Differently with PPARα and HNF-4Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2000
- Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors: Nuclear Control of MetabolismEndocrine Reviews, 1999
- PPAR-RXR Heterodimer Activates a Peroxisome Proliferator Response Element Upstream of the Bifunctional Enzyme GeneBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1993
- Effects of chronic treatment with the leukotriene D4-antagonist compound LY171883 on B6C3F1 miceFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1990
- Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferatorsNature, 1990
- Apparent induction of microsomal carboxylesterase activities in tissues of clofibrate-fed mice and ratsToxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1987
- Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4Nature, 1970