A comparison of detrended correspondence analysis and principal co‐ordinates analysis using four sets of Tasmanian vegetation data
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Australian Journal of Ecology
- Vol. 9 (3) , 273-279
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1984.tb01363.x
Abstract
Indirect gradient analysis, which entails the elucidation of relationships between trends in community composition and underlying environmental or successional gradients, is a major objective of ordination in plant ecology. Two ordination techniques, detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and principal co‐ordinates analysis (PCOA), were compared using three sets of Tasmanian vegetation data having known gradients and one set where the vegetation was expected to respond to diverse environmental variables. In every case, the results obtained by DCA were considered superior to, or at least as good as, those of PCOA. Hence, DCA appears to be the more suitable of the two methods for indirect gradient analysis.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short Note Strategy and tactics in pattern analysis: a response to Harrington, Dawes and LudwigAustral Ecology, 1982
- Vegetation of an alkaline pan — acidic peat mosaic in the Hardwood River Valley, TasmaniaAustralian Journal of Ecology, 1982
- An analysis of the vegetation pattern in a semi-arid Eucalyptus populnea woodland in north-west New South WalesAustral Ecology, 1981
- Plant communities of the Mt Wellington Range, TasmaniaAustral Ecology, 1977
- The Relationship Between Sample Similarity and Ecological DistanceEcology, 1973
- Coenocline SimulationEcology, 1972
- A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its PropertiesPublished by JSTOR ,1971
- GRADIENT ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION*Biological Reviews, 1967
- Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysisBiometrika, 1966
- Some Distance Properties of Latent Root and Vector Methods Used in Multivariate AnalysisBiometrika, 1966