Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States
- 6 November 2003
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 349 (19) , 1866-1868
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200311063491916
Abstract
In the study by McGlynn et al. (June 26 issue),1 participants received only about half of recommended care. It may be possible to double efficiency by working harder and smarter, as Steinberg suggests in his accompanying editorial,2 but this is unlikely. Physicians would need 7.4 hours per working day to fully satisfy all the recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.3 This is the time to be allotted to prevention only. Now add the time needed for other tasks, such as care of the sick, continuing medical education, and administration. Completing all these tasks according to recommendation would probably require working more than 15 to 20 hours per working day. It follows that eight hours per working day would allow physicians to satisfy only half of the current recommendations, as suggested by the findings of McGlynn et al.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Improving the Quality of Care — Can We Practice What We Preach?New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Primary Care: Is There Enough Time for Prevention?American Journal of Public Health, 2003
- The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical recordJournal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- Urban-Rural Differences in the Quality of Care for Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2001
- Comparison of Vignettes, Standardized Patients, and Chart Abstraction: A Prospective Validation Study of 3 Methods for Measuring QualityJAMA, 2000
- Predicting risk among non-respondents in prospective studiesEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1981