Intensive Therapy With Inhaled Insulin via the AERx Insulin Diabetes Management System
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 27 (1) , 162-167
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.1.162
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To compare the glycemic control of inhaled insulin via the AERx insulin diabetes management system (iDMS) with that of subcutaneous (SC) insulin, both combined with NPH insulin at bedtime, in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The AERx iDMS uses a liquid insulin formulation to achieve flexible precise mealtime dosing (with increments corresponding to 1 IU administered subcutaneously) and ensures insulin delivery only when the breathing technique is optimal. This trial in patients with type 2 diabetes compared the glycemic control (HbA1c) achieved by inhaled insulin administered via AERx iDMS with that using SC insulin. This was a randomized, 12-week, open-label, parallel, multicenter, multinational trial in 107 nonsmoking patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age 59 years, mean duration of diabetes 11.9 years). Patients were randomized to receive either inhaled fast-acting human insulin via AERx iDMS immediately before meals or SC fast-acting human insulin administered 30 min before meals, both in combination with evening NPH insulin. RESULTS—Baseline and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA1c between the AERx and SC groups after 12 weeks of treatment (7.84 ± 0.77 vs. 7.76 ± 0.77%, P = 0.60). Fasting serum glucose was significantly lower in the AERx group compared with the SC group by the end of the trial (8.9 ± 3.8 vs. 10.8 ± 3.7 mmol/l, P = 0.01) with a similar NPH dose in the two groups (0.23 vs. 0.23 IU/kg, P = 0.93). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the intra-subject variability of fasting or prandial blood glucose increment. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. No major safety concerns were raised during the trial. CONCLUSIONS—In patients with type 2 diabetes, preprandial inhaled insulin via AERx iDMS is as effective as preprandial SC insulin injection in achieving glycemic control with similar tolerability.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulinInternational Journal of Obesity, 2002
- Pulmonary Insulin Administration Using the AERx® System: Physiological and Physicochemical Factors Influencing Insulin Effectiveness in Healthy Fasting SubjectsDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2000
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Intraperitoneal Insulin Infusion by Means of Implantable PumpsHormone and Metabolic Research, 1998
- Limitations of treatments available for the management of Type 2 diabetes: Results from an international survey of physiciansPractical Diabetes International, 1998
- NIDDM Patients' Fears and Hopes About Insulin Therapy: The basis of patient reluctanceDiabetes Care, 1997
- Aerosol deposition in the human lung following administration from a microprocessor controlled pressurised metered dose inhaler.Thorax, 1995
- Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year studyDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 1995
- Prediction of Drug Residence Times in Regions of the Human Respiratory Tract Following Aerosol InhalationJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1986
- Über Inhalation von InsulinJournal of Molecular Medicine, 1924