Nonattendance in the Stockholm mammography screening trial: Relative Mortality and reasons for nonattendance
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 35 (3) , 267-275
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00665978
Abstract
The first objective of this study was to analyze the survival rate in a group of 69 breast cancers detected among nonattenders in a randomized mammographic screening trial in relation to 142 clinically detected cancers in a nonscreened control population. By analyzing the cancers of the nonattenders we identified two subgroups, one (A) had actively avoided mammography, had cancers in more advanced stages on diagnosis, and had significantly higher mortality from breast cancer than the control group (p = 0.003). The second subgroup (B) had mammography done outside the screening program. This subgroup had a nonsignificant, slightly better survival (p = 0.19) compared to the control group. Concerning stage the cancers in group B were similar to the cancers by the screening program. The second objective was to analyze women's reasons for nonattendance in the screening program. We interviewed 200 randomly selected nonattenders; 33% stated that they never could imagine having mammography (definite nonattenders), 29.5% that they for various reasons had missed the mammography but could imagine having it next time (possible future attenders), and 32% had been examined outside the program. Reasons for nonattendance included disinterest, medical problems, and fear of X-rays. From this interview investigation we believe that the subgroup of definite nonattenders (33%) is difficult to influence. The second subgroup classified as possible future attenders (29.5%) we believe can be influenced by more information and a new opportunity to receive mammography, i.e., a reminder letter. The third subgroup, those examined outside the screening program (32%) were aware of the benefit of mammography, taking action on their own. Concerning these women's health this seems acceptable; screening outside the program seemed equivalent to that inside the program concerning stage and mortality in breast cancer as shown in the first part of the study.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors associated with non-participation of women in a breast cancer screening programme in a town in northern Italy.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1991
- Randomized study of mammography screening — preliminary report on mortality in the stockholm trialBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1991
- Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screeningPreventive Medicine, 1990
- The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1989
- Screening for breast cancer in nijmegen. report of 6 screening rounds, 1975–1986International Journal of Cancer, 1989
- The Stockholm breast cancer screening trial — 5-year results and stage at discoveryBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1989
- Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial.BMJ, 1988
- A case‐control study of the efficacy of a non‐randomized breast cancer screening program in florence (Italy)International Journal of Cancer, 1986
- Randomized mammographic screening for breast cancer in StockholmBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1986
- REDUCTION OF BREAST CANCER MORTALITY THROUGH MASS SCREENING WITH MODERN MAMMOGRAPHYThe Lancet, 1984