A new approach to the analysis of multiple injuries using data from a national trauma registry
Open Access
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Injury Prevention
- Vol. 9 (2) , 156-162
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.2.156
Abstract
Objective:To present a new systematic approach for summarizing multiple injury diagnosis data into patient injury profiles.Design:International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification injury diagnosis codes were classified using a modification of the Barell body region by nature of injury diagnosis matrix, then grouped by body region, injury nature, or a combination of both. Profiles were built which describe patients’ injury combinations based on matrix units, enabling the analysis of patients, and not only the study of injuries.Setting:The Israeli national trauma registry was used to retrieve patient demographic data, injury details, and information on treatment and outcome.Patients or subjects:All hospitalized patients injured in road traffic accidents and included in the trauma registry from January 1997 to December 2000 were included.Main outcome measures:Patient profiles consisting of body regions, injury natures, their combination, and their clinical outcomes.Results:The study population comprised 17 459 patients. Head and neck injuries were the most frequent in all subpopulations except for motorcyclists who sustained most injuries in the extremities. Fractures were the most common injury nature (60%). Pedestrians and drivers had the highest proportion of multiple injuries in both profiles.Forty eight percent of the patients had a single cell profile. The most frequent conditions as a sole condition were extremity fractures (14%), internal injuries to the head (11%), and injuries of other nature to the torso (6%). Mortality, length of stay, and intensive care unit treatment varied dramatically between profiles and increased for multiple injury profiles. Inpatient death was an outcome for 3.3% overall; however, in patients with an internal injury to the head and torso, inpatient death rate was nine times higher, at 31%.Conclusions:Profiles maintain information on body region and nature of injury. The use of injury profiles in describing the injured improves the understanding of casemix and can be useful for efficient staffing in multidisciplinary trauma teams and for various comparisons.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of the Abilities of Nine Scoring Algorithms in Predicting MortalityPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2002
- An introduction to the Barell body region by nature of injury diagnosis matrixInjury Prevention, 2002
- Evaluation of Staff Workload during Resuscitation of Trauma PatientsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2002
- Relationship Between Trauma Center Volume and OutcomesJAMA, 2001
- Comparison of Alternative Methods for Assessing Injury Severity Based on Anatomic DescriptorsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- Motorcycle helmet use and injury outcome and hospitalization costs from crashes in Washington State.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- Treatment Results of Patients with Multiple TraumaThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995
- Inpatient costs of injury due to motor vehicle traffic crashes in New ZealandAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1993
- MEDICALLY RELATED MOTOR VEHICLE INJURY COSTS BY BODY REGION AND SEVERITYPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1993
- Progress in Characterizing Anatomic InjuryPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1990