The One-Month Temporal Stability of Children's Self-Reported Hand Preferences
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Vol. 1 (2) , 143-148
- https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298300100204
Abstract
An investigation was conducted of the one-month temporal stability of the Raczkowski, Kalat, & Nebes (1974) item pool for measuring self-reported hand preference. The subjects were 267 children, ranging in age from 8 through 14. On the aggregate, the most reliable measures were hand preferences for writing, drawing, and throwing a baseball, which showed a reliability comparable to that found with adult samples. The reliabilities of the remaining items were somewhat lower, although still acceptable for inclusion in a questionnaire. Two activities—striking a match and using a tennis racket—were not performed by a large portion of the sample, and should not be included in a children's hand-preference questionnaire.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring handedness with questionnairesPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Neuropsychological screening with school-age children: Rationale and conceptualizationPsychology in the Schools, 1982
- Children's, adolescents', and adults' reports of hand preference: Homogeneity and discriminating power of selected tasksJournal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1981
- The validity and reliability of self‐report items for the measurement of lateral preferenceBritish Journal of Psychology, 1978
- A review of right hemisphere linguistic capabilities.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Left-handedness.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- RETEST RELIABILITIES AND INTERRELATIONSHIP OF THE ANNETT HAND PREFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND THE EDINBURGH HANDEDNESS INVENTORYBritish Journal of Psychology, 1975
- Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire itemsNeuropsychologia, 1974
- The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventoryNeuropsychologia, 1971
- A CLASSIFICATION OF HAND PREFERENCE BY ASSOCIATION ANALYSISBritish Journal of Psychology, 1970