Clinical efficacy and tolerability of extended‐release tolterodine and immediate‐release oxybutynin in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder: a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial
- 27 October 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 92 (7) , 741-747
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04468.x
Abstract
To compare extended-release (ER) tolterodine and immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin with placebo in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder (OAB). Men and women aged >or= 20 years with symptoms of urinary urgency, urinary frequency (>or= 8 micturitions/24 h), urge incontinence (>or= 5 episodes/week) and symptoms of OAB for >or= 6 months were randomized to double-blind treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily, oxybutynin IR 3 mg three times daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in numbers of incontinence episodes per week, voids/24 h and mean volume voided/void. Patient perceptions of bladder condition, urgency and treatment benefit were also assessed. In all, 608 patients were randomized to treatment with tolterodine (240), oxybutynin (246) or placebo (122). More patients prematurely withdrew on oxybutynin (23%) than with tolterodine (10.4%) or placebo (16.4%). After 12 weeks of treatment, the median number of incontinence episodes/week was reduced significantly more in the tolterodine (79%; P= 0.0027) and oxybutynin groups (76.5%; P= 0.0168) than on placebo (46.4%). There were also significantly greater improvements in the number of voids/24 h and volume voided/void with tolterodine and oxybutynin than with placebo. More patients in the tolterodine and oxybutynin than in the placebo groups reported improvements in perceived bladder condition, ability to hold urine and treatment benefit. Patients treated with oxybutynin reported more adverse events than those treated with tolterodine or placebo. Dry mouth was significantly more common with oxybutynin than with tolterodine (53.7% vs. 33.5%; P < 0.001), and occurred in 9.8% of placebo patients. Tolterodine ER has similar efficacy but is better tolerated than oxybutynin IR in Japanese and Korean patients with OAB.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Efficacy and Tolerability of the Extended-Release Formulations of Oxybutynin and Tolterodine for Overactive Bladder: Results of the OPERA TrialMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2003
- Tolterodine: As effective but better tolerated than oxybutynin in Asian patients with symptoms of overactive bladderInternational Journal of Urology, 2002
- The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub‐committee of the International Continence SocietyNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2002
- Treatment of Overactive Bladder with Once-daily Extended-release Tolterodine or Oxybutynin: The Antimuscarinic Clinical Effectiveness Trial (ACET)Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2002
- The Epidemiology of Overactive Bladder among Females in Asia: A Questionnaire SurveyInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2001
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tolterodine Compared to Oxybutynin and Placebo in Patients with Overactive BladderInternational Urogynecology Journal, 1999
- Quality‐of‐life aspects of the overactive bladder and the effect of treatment with tolterodineBJU International, 1999
- A medium term analysis of the subjective efficacy of treatment for women with detrusor instability and low bladder complianceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997