Radiographic stage of osteoarthritis or sex of the patient does not predict one year outcome after total hip arthroplasty
Open Access
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- other
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 60 (3) , 228-232
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.60.3.228
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether patients with severe radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) have a different outcome at one year after total hip replacement than patients with moderate radiographic OA. To investigate sex related differences in preoperative radiographic and self reported status and in postoperative outcome. METHODS 184 patients (96 women) with a mean age at surgery of 71.4 years (50–92), with primary OA of the hip were investigated preoperatively and six and 12 months postoperatively with two self administered questionnaires, SF-36 and WOMAC. The radiographs were evaluated by two independent radiologists using an atlas. Minimal joint space narrowing, osteophytes, cysts, sclerosis, and deformity were assessed. A summary grade 0–3 was made, based on joint space, where 3 is severe OA. The reference population for SF-36 consisted of 2901 subjects matched for age and sex from the general Swedish population. RESULTS 162 patients fulfilled the study criteria. 113 had grade 3, 47 grade 2, and two grade 1 radiographic OA. There was no difference in preoperative or postoperative pain and physical impairment between patients with moderate and severe radiographic OA. There were no sex related differences in preoperative radiographic status, or in postoperative outcome. Neither were any differences in preoperative radiographic status of OA found in patients with previous total hip replacement of the contralateral hip, compared with those who had not been operated on before. All patients, regardless of preoperative radiographic OA stage, showed significant postoperative improvement and at one year achieved a health related quality of life similar to that of the reference group. CONCLUSION The severity of radiographic changes indicating OA often weighs heavily in the surgeon's decision to perform a total hip replacement. Yet, the findings of this study emphasise that the preoperative radiographic stage of OA has no correlation with the postoperative outcome after one year. Furthermore, this study failed to detect any sex related differences in preoperative radiographic and self reported status or in postoperative outcome of hip replacement.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Nottingham health profile: Subjective health status and medical consultationsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: Preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgeryArthritis & Rheumatism, 1999
- Cross-Cultural Comparisons of the Content of SF-36 Translations across 10 CountriesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- What Is the Best Way of Assessing Outcome After Total Knee Replacement?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1996
- Radiological progression of hip osteoarthritis: definition, risk factors and correlations with clinical status.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1996
- The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey—I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in SwedenSocial Science & Medicine, 1995
- Association of radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee with knee pain: Data from the baltimore longitudinal study of agingArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- The short form‐36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplastyArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- Instruments to assess osteoarthritis–current status and future needs.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1995
- Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1994