Prototypicality Among Metaphors: On the Relative Frequency of Personification and Spatial Metaphors in Literature Written for Children Versus Adults
- 1 June 1986
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Metaphor and Symbolic Activity
- Vol. 1 (2) , 87-107
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0102_1
Abstract
This paper argues that personification is the prototypical metaphor and that it occurs more frequently than other metaphors, especially during the early stages of child development. The paper also argues that personification comes disguised in many other figurative devices (metonymy, spatial metaphors, and container metaphors) and syntactic expressions (frozen word orders and the nominal gender marking that is obligatory in languages such as French and German) and that it pervades many other aspects of human cognition (including fundamental philosophical frameworks such as objectivism and subjectivism). The main source of data is a frequency analysis of personification and spatial metaphors in two samples of poetry: one written for adults, the other for children. I categorized the topic and vehicle of each metaphor as either human or nonhuman and spatial or nonspatial and found that spatial topics and vehicles were relatively infrequent. Personifications (nonhuman topic-human vehicle) were much more commo...Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergence of action categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings.Psychological Review, 1983
- Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation.Psychological Review, 1982
- Metaphor and ThoughtLanguage, 1980
- Personification and the pronoun problemWomen's Studies International Quarterly, 1980
- Language and PerceptionPublished by Harvard University Press ,1976
- On the retrieval and lexical structure of verbsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976
- Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal1Journal of Social Issues, 1972
- His, hers and the children'sPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1970