Deconstructing the Tiebout Hypothesis
- 1 September 1983
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Vol. 1 (3) , 339-353
- https://doi.org/10.1068/d010339
Abstract
Tiebout's pure theory of local expenditures is analysed in terms of: (1) the theory of individual choice left implicit in the model; (2) the problems posed by the internal logic of the model; and (3) the inability of the model to explain patterns and events that we see. It is shown that the conception of equilibrium maintained by Tiebout cannot be sustained within the workings of reasonable adjustment mechanisms. A contextual argument is advanced to demonstrate the link between individual choice and the context of mobility, The implications of the Tiebout model and the proposed contextual theory of choice and mobility are both explored with respect to the equality of outcomes and public policy.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Poor People Do Not Move: Job Search Behavior and Disequilibrium Amongst Local Labor MarketsEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1983
- Rights, Property, and CommunityEconomic Geography, 1982
- A Critique of Tiebout's Theory of Local Public ExpendituresEconometrica, 1981
- Social Reproduction and the Time-Geography of Everyday LifeGeografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 1981
- Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual RelationsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1979
- Spatial equilibrium with local public goods: Urban land rent, optimal city size and the Tiebout hypothesisRegional Science and Urban Economics, 1977
- Behavioral aspects of the decision to migratePapers in Regional Science, 1965
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960
- A Pure Theory of Local ExpendituresJournal of Political Economy, 1956
- The Pure Theory of Public ExpenditureThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1954