High‐latitude ionospheric electrodynamics as determined by the assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics procedure for the conjunctive SUNDIAL/ATLAS 1/GEM period of March 28–29, 1992
Open Access
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 101 (A12) , 26697-26718
- https://doi.org/10.1029/96ja00513
Abstract
During the conjunctive SUNDIAL/ATLAS 1/GEM campaign period of March 28–29, 1992, a set of comprehensive data has been collected both from space and from ground. The assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics (AMIE) procedure is used to derive the large‐scale high‐latitude ionospheric conductivity, convection, and other related quantities, by combining the various data sets. The period was characterized by several moderate substorm activities. Variations of different ionospheric electrodynamic fields are examined for one substorm interval. The cross‐polar‐cap potential drop, Joule heating, and field‐aligned current are all enhanced during the expansion phase of substorms. The most dramatic changes of these fields are found to be associated with the development of the substorm electrojet in the post midnight region. Variations of global electrodynamic quantities for this 2‐day period have revealed a good correlation with the auroral electrojet (AE) index. In this study we have calculated the AE index from ground magnetic perturbations observed by 63 stations located between 55° and 76° magnetic latitudes north and south, which is larger than the standard AE index by about 28% on the average over these 2 days. Different energy dissipation channels have also been estimated. On the average over the 2 days, the total globally integrated Joule heating rate is about 102 GW and the total globally integrated auroral energy precipitation rate is about 52 GW. Using an empirical formula, the ring current energy injection rate is estimated to be 125 GW for a decay time of 3.5 hours, and 85 GW for a decay time of 20 hours. We also find an energy‐coupling efficiency of 3% between the solar wind and the magnetosphere for a southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) condition.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Atmospheric energy input and ionization by energetic electrons during the geomagnetic storm of 8–9 November 1991Geophysical Research Letters, 1993
- Birkeland currents and energetic particles associated with optical auroral signatures of a westward traveling surgeJournal of Geophysical Research, 1987
- Magnetotail energy storage and release during the CDAW 6 substorm analysis intervalsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1985
- Hemispherical Joule heating and the AE indicesJournal of Geophysical Research, 1984
- The Joule heat production rate and the particle energy injection rate as a function of the geomagnetic indices AE and ALJournal of Geophysical Research, 1983
- Electric conductivities, electric fields and auroral particle energy injection rate in the auroral ionosphere and their empirical relations to the horizontal magnetic disturbancesPlanetary and Space Science, 1983
- Ionospheric and field-aligned current systems in the auroral zone: a concise reviewAdvances In Space Research, 1982
- Joint two-dimensional observations of ground magnetic and ionospheric electric fields associated with auroral zone currents: Current systems associated with local auroral break-upsPlanetary and Space Science, 1981
- Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphereSpace Science Reviews, 1981
- The dynamics of the aurora—II Westward traveling surgesJournal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 1965