Dynastic oral tradition, administrative records and archaeology in the Andes
- 1 February 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in World Archaeology
- Vol. 7 (3) , 269-279
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1976.9979640
Abstract
Many questions about the structure and dynamics of native Andean societies can be answered by research strategies which carefully coordinate written sources and the archaeological record. Ways are explored in which archaeological tactics have been, and may be, combined with the two major kinds of written sources available for the Andes ‐ dynastic oral tradition and administrative records. It is emphasized that both kinds of sources need to be verified and expanded by archaeology, although they differ somewhat in the way they are approached. Oral tradition provides the basis for rather general hypotheses about Andean society, particularly at the state level. Administrative records, on the other hand, offer specific regional details, with an invaluable opportunity to see below the imperial mantle and to locate and check concrete examples of widespread practices and institutions.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Huanuco Viejo: An Inca Administrative CenterAmerican Antiquity, 1970
- An Aymara Kingdom in 1567Ethnohistory, 1968
- The Inca Bridges in the Huánuco RegionAmerican Antiquity, 1966
- A Reply to BrundageAmerican Anthropologist, 1966
- Response to Zuidema's Review of “The Empire of the Inca”American Anthropologist, 1966
- : Empire of the Inca . Burr Cartwright Brundage.American Anthropologist, 1965
- An Archaeological “Restudy” of an Andean Ethnohistorical AccountAmerican Antiquity, 1962
- The Inca Occupation of the South Coast of PeruSouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1959