Caste and Personal Rank in an Indian Village: An Extension in Techniques1
- 1 June 1969
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Anthropologist
- Vol. 71 (3) , 434-453
- https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1969.71.3.02a00030
Abstract
Caste is a dominant theme in the Indian status order, but observations of social behavior in a village make it clear that caste alone does not determine fully the status order of the villagers. The hypothesis is offered that within his home village each individual has a personal status that is a combination of his caste status and such noncaste statuses as wealth, power, and office. It is further suggested that vector analysis can offer a useful model for perceiving personal status. To test the hypothesis, Marriott's caste‐ranking technique was used to rank thirty Konduru castes and eighteen individuals. A comparison of the two tests throws light on the relative importance of caste as a determinant in the personal status order and the extent to which a man's influence in the village is determined by non‐caste factors. There are possible implications for the concepts of caste and caste structures.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Objective Method for Determining the Collective Caste Hierarchy of an Indian Village1American Anthropologist, 1963
- Caste in India and the United StatesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1960
- Dangers of HalothaneBMJ, 1960
- Introduction to Statistical Analysis.Biometrika, 1957
- Some Hierarchical Aspects of CasteSouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1956