Physiological Investigation of a Unique Extract of Black Cohosh (Cimicifugae racemosae rhizoma): A 6-Month Clinical Study Demonstrates No Systemic Estrogenic Effect
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine
- Vol. 11 (2) , 163-174
- https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902753645308
Abstract
Objective: This study sought to confirm the efficacy and safety of the currently recognized dose of Cimicifugae racemosae rhizoma (40 mg/day) and to evaluate a higher dose and its associated physiological effects. Methods: We conducted a controlled, randomized, double-blinded parallel group study of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women treated with two different doses (39 mg and 127.3 mg) of a unique C. racemosa preparation over a 24-week period. Efficacy and tolerability were determined by the Kupperman Menopause Index, Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), a global assessment of tolerability, adverse events, routine hematology, and biochemical tests. To determine if the unique C. racemosa preparation exerts its effect through an estrogen-identical mode of action, we investigated vaginal cytology and gynecologically relevant hormones. Results: Both perimenopausal and postmenopausal patients tolerated the treatment well, and menopausal symptoms decreased regardless of dose (responder rate 70% and 72%, respectively). The lack of change in vaginal cytology measures indicates a nonestrogenic effect of the tested extract in this critical organ. Likewise, the lack of significant changes in the levels of gynecologically relevant hormones does not indicate an overall estrogenic effect. Conclusions: The higher dose did not exert a significantly greater effect on any end point. Thus, the currently recognized standard dose of the isopropanolic aqueous C. racemosa extract should be preferred over the higher dose. Despite the absence of a placebo group, this study suggests that C. racemosa extract is associated with improvement in menopause symptoms without evidence of estrogenlike effects.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estrogen Replacement Therapy and Ovarian Cancer Mortality in a Large Prospective Study of US WomenJAMA, 2001
- Menopausal Estrogen and Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer RiskJAMA, 2000
- Randomized Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal WomenJAMA, 1998
- Improving compliance with hormonal replacement therapy in primary osteoporosis preventionMaturitas, 1997
- Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52 705 women with breast cancer and 108 411 women without breast cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- The Use of Estrogens and Progestins and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Hormone replacement therapy and endometrial cancer risk: A meta-analysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Estrogen Replacement Therapy and Fractures in Older WomenAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Determinants of first prescription of hormone replacement therapy. A follow-up study among 1689 women aged 45–60 yearsMaturitas, 1994
- COMPARATIVE CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ESTROGENIC PREPARATIONS BY THE MENOPAUSAL AND AMENORRHEAL INDICES*†Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1953