A Comparison of Cefaclor Versus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination in the Treatment of Acute Urinary Infections
- 31 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 125 (2) , 228-229
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54981-2
Abstract
Acute lower urinary tract infections were treated in 57 women according to a randomized protocol, using cefaclor, a cephalosporin whose chemical structure is similar to that of cephalexin, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination. Urine cultures were made before treatment was started, midway through the 10 day course of therapy, 1 wk after therapy and 4-6 wk after therapy, if possible. Urine cultures in 100% of the patients became sterile during therapy and remained so 1 wk after therapy. Of those patients undergoing followup cultures 4-6 wk after therapy 98% had sterile urine. Twenty-nine patients were randomized to cefaclor therapy and 28 received a trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination. There was no difference between the 2 drugs studied in terms of efficacy. No side effects were noted with cefaclor and 2 minor side effects were noted with the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination. Cefaclor in a twice daily dosage schedule appears to be a safe and useful drug in the treatment of urinary tract infections caused by the common gram-negative organisms and it appears to be as efficacious as the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Excretory Urograms Necessary in Evaluating Women with Urinary Tract Infection?Journal of Urology, 1979
- In Vitro Activity of Cefaclor, a New Orally Administered Cephalosporin AntibioticAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1977
- Serum versus Urinary Antimicrobial Concentrations in Cure of Urinary-Tract InfectionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974
- Treatment of PyelonephritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1965