Evidence‐based practice in primary care: past, present and future
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Vol. 2 (4) , 249-263
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00055.x
Abstract
As in other health care specialities, evidence‐based practice is beginning to have an impact on the philosophy and workings of primary care. Some practising clinicians, however, may wish to question its relevance to their everyday work, and whether general practitioners and other members of the primary health care team can realistically adopt a new approach to clinical decision making, at a time of such high workload and competing priorities.Major changes have taken place during the last 20 years as a result of the National Health Service (NHS) reforms, the development of general practice and primary care research, and other health service innovations such as the introduction of new technologies, which have had an important impact on primary care. Issues such as the availability and use of different research methods, the role of experts, and the development of guidelines, audit and evaluation of care, are becoming subject to renewed scrutiny.Within this context, this article explores the potential of an evidence‐based approach in the primary care setting, and discusses possible strategies for change to assist the dissemination of research into practice and the implementation of evidence‐based health care.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confusion of levels in monitoring outcomes and/or processThe Lancet, 1996
- The protagonists of ‘evidence‐based medicine’: arrogant, seductive and controversialJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Evidence‐based medicine: Reference? Dogma? Neologism? New orthodoxy?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Patients' preferences and randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1996
- Meta‐analysis or best‐evidence synthesis?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1995
- Clinical guidelines and the law: advice, guidance or regulation?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1995
- Evaluation of medical audit.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
- Proposals for the health sciences-I. Compulsory retirement for expertsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1983
- THE INVERSE CARE LAWThe Lancet, 1971