Is there a Minimum Caseload that Achieves Acceptable Operative Mortality in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Operations?
- 30 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
- Vol. 32 (3) , 273-276
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.03.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of mortality rate after aortic surgery as a performance indicatorBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Mortality control charts for comparing performance of surgical units: validation study using hospital mortality dataBMJ, 2003
- Volume of procedures and outcome of treatmentBMJ, 2002
- Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the LiteratureAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- A systematic review of discharge coding accuracyJournal of Public Health, 2001
- Volume-outcome relationships in cardiovascular operations: New York state, 1990-1995The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- Hospital vascular surgery volume and procedure mortality rates in California, 1982-1994Journal of Vascular Surgery, 1998
- Hospital volume, calendar age, and short term outcomes in patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the Ontario experience, 1988-92.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1996
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Veterans Affairs medical centersJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Michigan: An eleven-year statewide experienceJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1994