Significance of magnetic coil position in peripheral motor nerve stimulation
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Muscle & Nerve
- Vol. 13 (8) , 681-686
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880130804
Abstract
The influences of coil position and coil–nerve distance on compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs), recorded from the first dorsalinterosseus muscle during magnetic stimulation of the brachial segment of the ulnar nerve, were studied in 10 healthy volunteers. A 14‐cm coil was held tangentially to the skin with the center overlying the nerve. Mapping of the CMAP latencies and amplitudes was made as the coil was displaced laterally in steps of 1 cm and in planes 0–3 cm from the skin surface. Stimulation with the coil center positioned 3 cm laterally to the nerve with the coil current directed proximally yielded the largest amplitudes with minimal variability and the most constant relationship to electrically evoked CMAPs. In this position the interindividual and intraindividual reproducibility of the magnetically evoked latencies were at least as good as those of electric stimulation when coil–skin distance was ⩽ 2 cm.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The utility of magnetic stimulation for routine peripheral nerve conduction studiesMuscle & Nerve, 1988
- Central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis: evaluation of abnormalities revealed by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the brain.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1988
- Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain.The Journal of Physiology, 1987