Court Responses to Withholding or Withdrawing Artificial Nutrition and Fluids
- 19 April 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 253 (15) , 2243-2245
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1985.03350390085031
Abstract
THE WITHHOLDING or withdrawing of artificial nutrition and fluids from a patient is an emotionally charged and controversial issue, one that raises cries of "euthanasia" and, in the case of two California physicians, an indictment for murder. Two intermediate appellate courts, California1 and Massachusetts,2 have faced the medical-legal issue, the former in a criminal action and the latter in a civil case, and each has issued a final ruling approving the withholding or withdrawal of artificial feeding in certain limited circumstances. A third appellate court's characterization of a trial judge's order permitting the removal of a nasogastric tube from 84-year-old Claire Conroy who was suffering from advanced organic brain syndrome and other multiple serious ailments as "authorizing euthanasia," is presently under review by the New Jersey Supreme Court.3 These cases, which generated widespread notice and apprehension within the medical community, have resulted in a spate of recent articlesKeywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: