Similarity and rules: distinct? exhaustive? empirically distinguishable?
- 1 January 1998
- Vol. 65 (2-3) , 197-230
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00044-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networksPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995
- Fragmentary knowledge and the processing-specific control of structural sensitivity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1994
- Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1992
- Against Logicist Cognitive ScienceMind & Language, 1991
- Function learning: Induction of continuous stimulus-response relations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1991
- Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990
- Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1989
- This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1987
- Rules and causationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980