Long-term experience with a low-dose oral contraceptive
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Gynecological Endocrinology
- Vol. 4 (4) , 277-286
- https://doi.org/10.3109/09513599009024982
Abstract
Oral contraception has proved to be the most efficient reversible method of fertility control for over 25 years. During this period, various investigations and epidemiological studies have suggested that some risks may be involved, but, on the other hand, a number of non-contraceptive benefits have become obvious. The results of these investigations were taken into account when new formulations had to be developed, with an aim to improving hormonal fertility control with regard to its tolerance, cycle control, and impact on metabolism. Since then, the objective of research has been to contrive new hormonal contraceptives which ensure safety to the largest possible extent, from a medical point of view, for the sake of the patient, without affecting contraceptive effectiveness. The aim to reduce side-effects connected with the use of oral contraception, as well as to lower the risks possibly involved, has obviously been achieved by extensive research. Both by devising a new substance and reducing doses, the criteria of modern low-dose oral contraception have been met, as has become evident in the course of the clinical experience gathered with Femovan.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in metabolism induced by oral contraceptives containing desogestrel and gestodene in older womenContraception, 1990
- Changes in lipid metabolism during 12 months of treatment with two oral contraceptives containing 30 μg ethinylestradiol and 75 μg gestodene or 150 μg desogestrelContraception, 1990
- Clinical and metabolic effects of a pill containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol plus 75 mcg gestodeneContraception, 1989
- Gestoden, an innovative progestogenContraception, 1988
- Contraception: An overviewAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT CONTRACEPTIVE METHODSThe Lancet, 1982