Enzyme kinetics in reversed micelles

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The kinetic parameters of 20.beta.-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase were determined in aqueous solutions and in reversed micellar media composed with either an anionic, a cationic or a nonionic surfactant, at low and at high ionic strength. The velocity data were analysed in two ways: first by extrapolation to infinite concentrations of both substrates to determine ''apparent'' Michaelis constants and V values, and secondly by comparison to reaction rates calculated using the model presented (see first of this series of papers in this issue of the journal). Data analysis according to the first method reveals some differences in the kinetic parameters in reversed micelles as compared to those in aqueous solution, though the kinetic parameters of the enzyme seem not to be much affected by enclosure in reversed micelles. It is shown that the changes that do occur are not caused by a shift of the intramicellar pH or by electrostatic interactions between the enzyme and the surfactant head groups. Interpretation of the data using the second method assumes that the enzyme is not affected by the enclosure in reversed micelles, and that deviations with respect to the aqueous parameters are caused by exchange phenomena between distinct aqueous droplets in the organic phase and by a high effective intramicellar substrate concentration. This model is able to predict reaction rates that agree rather well with experimentally determined rates and explains why the enzyme mechanism in reversed micelles is, at all progesterone concentrations used, the same as observed at high progesterone concentrations in aqueous solution. Furthermore it clarifies the occurrence of substrate inhibition in sodium-di(ethylhexyl)sulphosuccinate-reversed micelles and the observed low activity in Triton-reversed micelles, as arising from the high partition coefficient of progesterone and the slow rate of diffusion of progesterone into the reversed micelles. From these results, and those reported for enoate reductase (see preceding paper in this issue of the journal) it can be concluded that the theory presented before (see first of this series of papers in this issue of the journal) offers a good explanation for the observed kinetic behaviour in reversed micelles, and emphasizes the importance of exchange processes between micelles.