Reply to “Comment on ‘Clustering of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays and their sources’ ”
- 30 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review D
- Vol. 69 (12) , 128302
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.69.128302
Abstract
We reiterate that there is no evidence that BL Lacs are sources of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the evidence for clustering in the arrival directions of AGASA's ultrahigh energy cosmic raysAstroparticle Physics, 2004
- Cuts and penalties: Comment on “Clustering of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays and their sources”Physical Review D, 2004
- On the Cross-Correlation between the Arrival Direction of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays, BL Lacertae Objects, and EGRET Detections: A New Way to Identify EGRET Sources?The Astrophysical Journal, 2003
- Clustering of ultrahigh energy cosmic rays and their sourcesPhysical Review D, 2003
- BL Lacertae are probable sources of the observed ultrahigh energy cosmic raysJETP Letters, 2001
- Correlation function of ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays favors point sourcesJETP Letters, 2001
- Cluster analysis of extremely high energy cosmic rays in the northern skyAstroparticle Physics, 2000
- Small‐Scale Anisotropy of Cosmic Rays above 1019eV Observed with the Akeno Giant Air Shower ArrayThe Astrophysical Journal, 1999
- BATSE Observations of the Large-Scale Isotropy of Gamma-Ray BurstsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1996