Drag-and-drop versus point-and-click mouse interaction styles for children
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-33
- https://doi.org/10.1145/371127.371146
Abstract
This research investigates children's use of two common mouse interaction styles, drag-and-drop and point-and-click, to determine whether the choice of interaction style impacts children's performance in interactive learning environments. The interaction styles were experimentally compared to determine if either method was superior to the other in terms of speed, error rate, or user preference, for children. The two interaction styles were also compared based on children's achievement and motivation, within a commercial software environment. Experiment I used an interactive learning environment as children played two versions of an educational puzzle-solving game, each version utilizing a different mouse interaction style; experiment II used a mouse-controlled software environment modeled after the educational game. The results were similar to previous results reported for adults: the point-and-click interaction style was faster; fewer errors were committed using it; and it was preferred over the drag-and-drop interaction style. Within the context of the puzzle-solving game, the children solved significantly fewer puzzles, and they were less motivated using the version that utilized a drag-and-drop interaction style as compared to the version that utilized a point-and-click interaction style. These results were also explored through the use of state-transition diagrams and GOMS models, both of which supported the experimental data gathered.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Movement characteristics using a mouse with tactile and force feedbackInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1996
- Integrality and separability of input devicesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1994
- Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction, 1992
- Gender, Experience and Attributions to the ComputerJournal of Educational Computing Research, 1991
- A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasksPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,1991
- Sex Bias in Educational Software: The Effect of Designers' Stereotypes on the Software They Design1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1987
- Gender and computers: Two surveys of computer-related attitudesSex Roles, 1985
- Women, girls, and computers: A first look at the evidenceSex Roles, 1985
- Gender Differences in LonelinessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1985
- Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-Controlled Isometric Joystick, Step Keys, and Text Keys for Text Selection on a CRTErgonomics, 1978