Public-Health and Individual Approaches to Antiretroviral Therapy: Township South Africa and Switzerland Compared
Open Access
- 8 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 5 (7) , e148
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050148
Abstract
The provision of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in resource-limited settings follows a public health approach, which is characterised by a limited number of regimens and the standardisation of clinical and laboratory monitoring. In industrialized countries doctors prescribe from the full range of available antiretroviral drugs, supported by resistance testing and frequent laboratory monitoring. We compared virologic response, changes to first-line regimens, and mortality in HIV-infected patients starting HAART in South Africa and Switzerland. We analysed data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and two HAART programmes in townships of Cape Town, South Africa. We included treatment-naïve patients aged 16 y or older who had started treatment with at least three drugs since 2001, and excluded intravenous drug users. Data from a total of 2,348 patients from South Africa and 1,016 patients from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study were analysed. Median baseline CD4+ T cell counts were 80 cells/μl in South Africa and 204 cells/μl in Switzerland. In South Africa, patients started with one of four first-line regimens, which was subsequently changed in 514 patients (22%). In Switzerland, 36 first-line regimens were used initially, and these were changed in 539 patients (53%). In most patients HIV-1 RNA was suppressed to 500 copies/ml or less within one year: 96% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95%–97%) in South Africa and 96% (94%–97%) in Switzerland, and 26% (22%–29%) and 27% (24%–31%), respectively, developed viral rebound within two years. Mortality was higher in South Africa than in Switzerland during the first months of HAART: adjusted hazard ratios were 5.90 (95% CI 1.81–19.2) during months 1–3 and 1.77 (0.90–3.50) during months 4–24. Compared to the highly individualised approach in Switzerland, programmatic HAART in South Africa resulted in similar virologic outcomes, with relatively few changes to initial regimens. Further innovation and resources are required in South Africa to both achieve more timely access to HAART and improve the prognosis of patients who start HAART with advanced disease.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed diagnosis of HIV infection and late initiation of antiretroviral therapy in the Swiss HIV Cohort StudyHIV Medicine, 2008
- Use of single-dose nevirapine for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: does development of resistance matter?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Asymptomatic serum cryptococcal antigenemia and early mortality during antiretroviral therapy in rural UgandaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2007
- Prevalence and determinants of transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance in HIV-1 infectionJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2007
- Resistance Mutational Analysis of HIV Type 1 Subtype C among Rural South African Drug-Naive Patients Prior to Large-Scale Availability of AntiretroviralsAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2006
- Determinants of Mortality and Nondeath Losses from an Antiretroviral Treatment Service in South Africa: Implications for Program EvaluationClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- National adult antiretroviral therapy guidelines in resource-limited countries: concordance with 2003 WHO guidelines?AIDS, 2006
- Cost-Effectiveness of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy in South AfricaPLoS Medicine, 2005
- Impact of antiretroviral combination therapies on AIDS surveillance reports in SwitzerlandAIDS, 1998
- The Swiss HIV Cohort Study: Rationale, organization and selected baseline characteristicsInternational Journal of Public Health, 1994