Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 56 (1) , 1-43
- https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00318
Abstract
This paper uses a disaggregated approach to study the volatility of common stocks at the market, industry, and firm levels. Over the period from 1962 to 1997 there has been a noticeable increase in firm‐level volatility relative to market volatility. Accordingly, correlations among individual stocks and the explanatory power of the market model for a typical stock have declined, whereas the number of stocks needed to achieve a given level of diversification has increased. All the volatility measures move together countercyclically and help to predict GDP growth. Market volatility tends to lead the other volatility series. Factors that may be responsible for these findings are suggested.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigationPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Industry costs of equityPublished by Elsevier ,1998
- The Impact of Options Trading on the Market Quality of the Underlying Security: An Empirical AnalysisThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- Stock market volatility and the business cycleJournal of Applied Econometrics, 1996
- Continuous Record Asymptotics for Rolling Sample Variance EstimatorsEconometrica, 1996
- Good News, Bad News, Volatility, and BetasThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Options markets and stock return volatilityJournal of Financial Economics, 1989
- Informational Externalities and Welfare-Reducing SpeculationJournal of Political Economy, 1987
- Expected stock returns and volatilityJournal of Financial Economics, 1987
- The Variability of the Market Factor of the New York Stock ExchangeThe Journal of Business, 1973