Polymorphism from environmental heterogeneity: models are only robust if the heterozygote is close in fitness to the favoured homozygote in each environment
- 1 June 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Genetics Research
- Vol. 45 (3) , 299-314
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s001667230002228x
Abstract
Summary: The lack of robustness of models of the maintenance of polymorphism in a heterogeneous environment which has been pointed out by Maynard Smith & Hoekstra (1980), applies also to models based on habitat selection, on temporal variation and on density-regulated selection. Only if (partial) dominance ‘switches’ between environments such that the fitness of the heterozygote is always close to the favoured homozygote, is there reasonable robustness. This is true for all models considered. It is argued that there are good reasons for supposing that the favourable allele at a locus may show dominance, although the experimental evidence is still scanty.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Density-Regulated Selection in a Heterogeneous EnvironmentThe American Naturalist, 1983
- Can genes choose habitats?Nature, 1980
- THE THEORETICAL POPULATION GENETICS OF VARIABLE SELECTION AND MIGRATIONAnnual Review of Genetics, 1976
- Hard and Soft Selection in a Subdivided PopulationThe American Naturalist, 1975
- Genetic Polymorphism in a Varied EnvironmentThe American Naturalist, 1970
- MAINTENANCE OF GENETIC HETEROGENEITYCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1955
- Genetic Equilibrium When More Than One Ecological Niche is AvailableThe American Naturalist, 1953
- THE EXPERIMENTAL MODIFICATION OF DOMINANCE IN DANFORTH'S SHORT‐TAILED MUTANT MICEAnnals of Eugenics, 1943
- GENETIC RESEARCH IN THE LEPIDOPTERA: BEING THE GALTON LECTURE OF LONDON UNIVERSITY, DELIVERED AUGUST 1939, TO THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF GENETICSAnnals of Eugenics, 1940
- XXI.—On the Dominance RatioProceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1923