Efficacy and cytotoxicity of cationic‐agent–mediated nonviral gene transfer into osteoblasts

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Ex vivo gene transfer into osteoblastic cells is an advantageous strategy for bone tissue engineering. This study investigated the efficacy and cytotoxicity of in vitro cationic-agent–mediated nonviral gene transfer into osteoblasts. Various cationic agents, lipid, gelatin, and polyethylenimine (PEI) were tested. Each was formulated in various concentrations to form a complex with plasmid DNA encoding red fluorescent protein. The cationic agent/DNA complexes were transfected into human fetal osteoblastic cell line and rat bone-marrow–derived primary osteoblasts, as well as NIH 3T3 fibroblast controls. Rat primary osteoblasts were transfected more with cationic lipid and PEI agents than with gelatin carrier, yielding transfection efficacy up to 18.1% and 12.7 %, respectively. In contrast, human fetal osteoblastic cell line was transfected more with cationic lipid and gelatin than with PEI. There was a positive correlation between the lipid and PEI doses and cytotoxicity. When the lipid and PEI were used to transfect the rat primary osteoblasts in a dose that yielded the highest transfection efficacy, cell survival rates decreased as low as 40%. When their transfection efficacies into primary osteoblasts were compromised at two thirds of the highest value, that is, 12.6% and 8.3% for the lipid and PEI, respectively, the cell survival rate was nearly 80%. Cationic gelatin was associated with cell survival rates over 60 % in any cell type, regardless of the doses tested. These results suggest that different types of osteoblastic cells may possess different ability to the uptake and expression of cationic-agent–bound DNA. There seemed to be agent-specific threshold doses that dropped the cell survival rate. Cationic-agent–mediated nonviral gene transfer into osteoblastic cells may be successful when the agent- and dose-dependent transfection efficacy and cytotoxicity are optimized. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 71A: 308–315, 2004