Differences in Review Quality and Recommendations for Publication Between Peer Reviewers Suggested by Authors or by Editors
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 295 (3) , 314-317
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.3.314
Abstract
Peer review plays a central role in determining what research is published. Peer reviewers are responsible for identifying methodological flaws and for improving the quality of manuscripts. Several factors are associated with review quality (reviewer age, being a current investigator, and postgraduate training in epidemiology or statistics).1,2 Many journals give authors the opportunity to suggest reviewers for their own paper, but editors' decisions to select these reviewers vary because some are concerned that they might favor the author. However, many journals find it hard to recruit good-quality reviewers and, as such, are willing to try authors' suggestions.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective studyBMC Medicine, 2006
- Development of the Review Quality Instrument (RQI) for Assessing Peer Reviews of ManuscriptsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trialBMJ, 1999
- Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensablePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviewsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1993