Effects of Errors in the Age Adjustment of First Lactations
Open Access
- 1 March 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Dairy Science Association in Journal of Dairy Science
- Vol. 51 (3) , 378-384
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(68)86994-2
Abstract
The DHIA [Dairy Herd Improvement Association] age factors of Ken-drick and McDaniel were compared using 10,620 first lactations made in Michigan Holstein herds during the period 1961-63. The effectiveness of the alternative age adjustments was judged by the impact on sire ranking and on the statistical properties of the standardized records. Bulls were found to rank almost identically, regardless of the manner of age adjustment. Rank correlations between proofs based on actual and age-corrected records were about .95. There were significant regressions of age-adjusted production on age, for both sets of factors. It was concluded that standard age adjustments may not be satisfactory in research applications requiring a high degree of accuracy.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Three Methods of Sire EvaluationJournal of Dairy Science, 1968
- Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Age EffectsJournal of Dairy Science, 1966
- Differences between Sires in Rate of Maturity of their DaughtersJournal of Dairy Science, 1965
- Studies on Dairy Herd RecordsActa Agriculturae Scandinavica, 1965
- Ratio Factors for Adjusting Monthly Test-Day Data for Age and Season of Calving and Ratio Factors for Extending Part Lactation RecordsJournal of Dairy Science, 1961
- Judging the Effectiveness of Age-Correction FactorsJournal of Dairy Science, 1960