The clinician as judge: implications of a series of studies.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Several suggestions are offered with regard to studies of clinical judgment applied to projective techniques: (1) Clinical judgments differ in certain respects from traditional test scores. (2) Many of the studies which show negative results in applying judgments to projective materials have employed overly complex units of projective material. (3) Positive results can be obtained by using samples of projective behavior which are neither overly simple or overly complex. (4) Other comments made emphasize "careful study of the clinician in setting the judgment task." 21 references. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: