Intensive Therapy With Growth Factor Support for Patients With Ewing Tumor Metastatic at Diagnosis: Pediatric Oncology Group/Children's Cancer Group Phase II Study 9457—A Report From the Children's Oncology Group
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 152-159
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.02.1717
Abstract
Prognosis is poor for Ewing sarcoma patients with metastasis at diagnosis. We intensified a five-drug therapy (ifosfamide, etoposide alternated with vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) using filgrastim but not stem-cell support. We studied topotecan alone and combined with cyclophosphamide in therapeutic windows before the five-drug therapy. A randomly assigned proportion of patients received amifostine as a cytoprotective agent. Eligible patients were ≤ 30 years old and had histologically proven Ewing sarcoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) and metastasis at diagnosis. Chemotherapeutic cycles began every 21 days, after recovery from toxicities. One hundred ten of the 117 patients enrolled were eligible. Thirty-six patients received initial topotecan. Three had partial responses (PRs), and 17 had progressive disease (PD). Thirty-seven patients were administered topotecan and cyclophosphamide; 21 of these patients achieved PR, and one patient had PD. In a randomly assigned group of 69 patients, amifostine did not provide myeloprotection, which was measured by absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, or cycle intervals. The best responses to the overall therapy included 45 complete responses, 41 PRs, stable disease in 14 patients, and PD in five patients. For all patients, the 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 24% (± 4%), and the overall survival rate was 46% (± 5%). For the 39 patients with isolated pulmonary metastases, the 2-year EFS rate was 31% (± 7%) compared with 20% (± 5%) for patients with more widespread disease. Topotecan had limited activity in patients with Ewing sarcoma or PNET metastatic at diagnosis. The topotecan-cyclophosphamide combination was active. Amifostine was not myeloprotective. Overall results showed no improvement compared with previous studies.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Addition of Ifosfamide and Etoposide to Standard Chemotherapy for Ewing's Sarcoma and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of BoneNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- How Effective Is Dose-Intensive/Myeloablative Therapy Against Ewing’s Sarcoma/Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor Metastatic to Bone or Bone Marrow? The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Experience and a Literature ReviewJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Up-Front Window Trial of Topotecan in Previously Untreated Children and Adolescents With Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: An Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- WR-2721 (amifostine) infusion in patients with Ewing's sarcoma receiving ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide with mesna: drug and thiol levels in plasma and blood cells, a Pediatric Oncology Group studyCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1999
- Phase I study of topotecan in combination with cyclophosphamide in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) Study of Topotecan Using a Five-Day Course in Children with Refractory Solid TumorsJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 1996
- Myeloablative radiochemotherapy and hematopoietic stem-cell rescue in poor-prognosis Ewing's sarcoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1993
- Ewing's sarcoma metastatic at diagnosis results and comparisons of two intergroup Ewing's sarcoma studiesCancer, 1990
- Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test ProceduresJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1972
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958