Need for Speed? Exchange Latency and Liquidity
Top Cited Papers
- 11 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 30 (4) , 1188-1228
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx006
Abstract
A faster exchange does not necessarily improve liquidity. On the one hand, speed enables a high-frequency market maker (HFM) to update quotes faster on incoming news. This reduces payoff risk and thus lowers the competitive bid-ask spread. On the other hand, HFM price quotes are more likely to meet speculative high-frequency bandits, and thus are less likely to meet liquidity traders. This raises the spread. The net effect of exchange speed depends on a security’s news-to-liquidity-trader ratio. Received June 4, 2015; editorial decision November 15, 2016 by Editor Andrew Karolyi.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- News Trading and SpeedThe Journal of Finance, 2016
- Trading Fast and Slow: Colocation and LiquidityThe Review of Financial Studies, 2015
- The High-Frequency Trading Arms Race: Frequent Batch Auctions as a Market Design Response *The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2015
- Equilibrium fast tradingJournal of Financial Economics, 2015
- Equity Trading in the 21st Century: An UpdateThe Quarterly Journal of Finance, 2015
- Physics in finance: Trading at the speed of lightNature, 2015
- High-Frequency Trading and Price DiscoveryThe Review of Financial Studies, 2014
- When Finance Meets Physics: The Impact of the Speed of Light on Financial Markets and Their RegulationThe Financial Review, 2014
- Market microstructure: A survey of microfoundations, empirical results, and policy implicationsJournal of Financial Markets, 2005
- Autoregressive Conditional Duration: A New Model for Irregularly Spaced Transaction DataEconometrica, 1998