Methodological Issues in Using a Polydiagnostic Approach to Define Psychotic Illness
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 161 (6) , 824-830
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.161.6.824
Abstract
Although a polydiagnostic approach to the definition of psychotic disorder provides many advantages to the researcher, there are also disadvantages. A comparison between several different sets of operational criteria using the opcrit computer program on a consecutive series of 397 psychotic subjects is described. The results show that although current diagnostic procedures are generally reliable, such approaches can still only supplement skilled clinical judgement, and there remain many pitfalls for the unwary.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Schizophrenia and Afro-Caribbeans a Case-Control StudyThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1991
- The Incidence of Operationally Defined Schizophrenia in Camberwell, 1965–84The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1991
- A Polydiagnostic Application of Operational Criteria in Studies of Psychotic IllnessArchives of General Psychiatry, 1991
- The Classification of the DepressionsThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1989
- The Composite International Diagnostic InterviewArchives of General Psychiatry, 1988
- Searching for the split in schizophrenia: A twin study perspectivePsychiatry Research, 1984
- Twin Concordance for Operationally Defined SchizophreniaArchives of General Psychiatry, 1984
- Criteria for Subtyping SchizophreniaArchives of General Psychiatry, 1974
- Flexible System for the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia: Report from the WHO International Pilot Study of SchizophreniaScience, 1973
- Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric ResearchArchives of General Psychiatry, 1972