The Importance of the Normality Assumption in Large Public Health Data Sets
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Public Health
- Vol. 23 (1) , 151-169
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546
Abstract
▪ Abstract It is widely but incorrectly believed that the t-test and linear regression are valid only for Normally distributed outcomes. The t-test and linear regression compare the mean of an outcome variable for different subjects. While these are valid even in very small samples if the outcome variable is Normally distributed, their major usefulness comes from the fact that in large samples they are valid for any distribution. We demonstrate this validity by simulation in extremely non-Normal data. We discuss situations in which in other methods such as the Wilcoxon rank sum test and ordinal logistic regression (proportional odds model) have been recommended, and conclude that the t-test and linear regression often provide a convenient and practical alternative. The major limitation on the t-test and linear regression for inference about associations is not a distributional one, but whether detecting and estimating a difference in the mean of the outcome answers the scientific question at hand.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrapStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- Robustness of the t and U tests under combined assumption violationsJournal of Applied Statistics, 1998
- Invalidation of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Tests by Concurrent Violation of Two AssumptionsThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1998
- Testing the Mean of Skewed DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Who Enrolled in a State Program for the UninsuredMedical Care, 1993
- A more realistic look at the robustness and Type II error properties of the t test to departures from population normality.Psychological Bulletin, 1992
- Randomization analysis of dental data characterized by skew and variance heterogeneityCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1991
- When is n Sufficiently Large?The American Statistician, 1976
- The Effect on the t Distribution of Non-Normality in the Sampled PopulationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1968
- The Distribution of `Student's t in Random Samples of any Size Drawn from Non-Normal UniversesBiometrika, 1949