Delay in the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Effect on Quality of Care and Its Assessment
Open Access
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 13 (9) , 931-938
- https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.016
Abstract
Background: Delay in diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may affect quality of care and its assessment. Objectives: To examine over time the frequency of delay in AMI diagnosis and the effect of this delay on the quality of patient care and its assessment. Methods: The authors examined the trend in coded admission diagnosis, age, comorbidities, procedures during hospitalization, and discharge status for 42,406 Connecticut Medicare cases with the principal discharge diagnosis of AMI for the time period 1992 through 2001. For 2,583 cases discharged in 1992 and 1993 and for 1,398 cases discharged in 1998 through 2001, the rates of administration of aspirin (ASA) and beta blocker (BB) on admission and discharge, by admission diagnosis, were ascertained. Results: For patients discharged with the principal diagnosis of AMI over the decade examined, the proportion with this diagnosis on admission fell (59% to 40%, p < 0.001), the proportion with a non–acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admission diagnosis rose (18% to 26%, p < 0.001), and the population aged (proportion older than 85 years of age increased from 16% to 28%, p < 0.001). Patients with ACS as the admission diagnosis more frequently received cardiac catheterization (during 2000–2001, 39% versus 17%, p < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (19% versus 4%, p < 0.001), and evidence‐based therapy; during 1998–2001, opportunities to give ASA or BB on admission were fulfilled for 88% versus 73% (p < 0.001), and on discharge, for 87% versus 74% (p < 0.005). Conclusions: The diagnosis of AMI is delayed after admission for a significant proportion of cases who receive care that is measured to be of lower quality. There is a need to more effectively diagnose and treat these cases with delayed diagnosis and to develop new quality measures to address changes in the characteristics of patients who are hospitalized with AMI.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Change in the Quality of Care Delivered to Medicare Beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001JAMA, 2003
- Triage of patients for a rapid (5-minute) electrocardiogram: A rule based on presenting chief complaintsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2000
- Quality of Medical Care Delivered to Medicare BeneficiariesJAMA, 2000
- Missed Diagnoses of Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency DepartmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Impact on the Care of the Emergency Department Chest Pain Patient from the Chest Pain Evaluation Registry (CHEPER) StudyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- Massachusetts emergency medicine closed malpractice claims: 1988–1990Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Serial ECGs are less accurate than serial CK-MB results for emergency department diagnosis of myocardial infarctionAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Early detection of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with chest pain and nondiagnostic ECGs: Serial CK-MB sampling in the emergency departmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- Litigation against the emergency physician: Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarctionAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency roomThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987