Abstract
This analysis is based on data used for the preceding paper in the series (J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 25, 1-17). The sexes were compared as to their performance upon pursuit and other motor learning tests, and as to the differential effects of interpolated periods filled with other motor activities, or with reading, upon retention of skill on the original task. In general, the women present a picture of somewhat greater amounts of change in performance, and susceptibility to changes in experimental routine. Arguments are brought forth to show that recovery from work decrement is but a partial explanation of the gains made in motor learning. The factor of reminiscence is proposed as an added determiner of the gains. A definition of reminiscence is suggested as part of this proposal. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: